Near complete remission of an inoperable pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma after BRAF-/MEK-inhibitor treatment-A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas are rare malignant neoplasms. High-quality evidence about the best treatment strategy is lacking. We present the case of a 52-year-old male with a BRAFV600E -mutated PACC who experienced a complete remission after chemotherapy with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors. CASE: The patient presented with upper abdomen pain, night sweat, and weight loss. CT scan showed a pancreatic tumor extending from the pancreas head to body. Histological workup identified an acinar cell carcinoma. As the tumor was inoperable, chemotherapy with FOFIRNIOX was initiated and initially showed a slight regression of disease. The regimen had to be discontinued due to severe side effects. Molecular analysis identified a BRAFV600E mutation, so the patient was started on BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors (dabrafenib/trametinib). After 16 months, CT scans showed a near complete remission with a markedly improved overall health. DISCUSSION: Studies suggest that up to one-fourth of PACCs carry a BRAF mutation and might therefore be susceptible to a BRAF-/MEK-inhibitor therapy. This offers a new therapeutic pathway to treat this rare but malignant neoplasm.

Tumor budding as a prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the association between tumor budding and perineural invasion as well as their prognostic role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. A total of N = 119 patients resected for pancreatic ductal carcinoma from 1996 to 2015 were included. Clinical and standard histopathological parameters were retrieved from the patient's records. One representative hematoxylin and eosin section from the tumor region was examined for perineural invasion and tumor budding using light microscopy. Tumor budding was assessed independently using two different methods: in the first approach, the number of buds was counted over three fields of 0.237 mm2 at 40-fold magnification; in the second approach, tumor budding was quantified according to the recommendation of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) over a field of 0.785 mm2 at 20-fold magnification. Linear and logistic regression was applied to delineate association between perineural invasion, tumor budding, and other parameters; Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used in the survival analysis. Regardless of the quantification approach, high tumor budding was a significant negative prognostic factor in the univariable Cox regression (> 5 buds/0.237 mm2, hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.61, p = 0.027; ≥ 10 buds/0.785 mm2, HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.07-2.64, p = 0.024). In the multivariable model adjusting for stage and standard histopathological parameters, lymph vessel invasion (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.47-4.03, p = 0.001) and tumor budding > 5 buds/0.237 mm2 (HR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.07-2.7, p = 0.026) were independent negative prognostic factors, while adjuvant therapy was a positive prognostic factor (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.86, p = 0.009). No significant prognostic value could be delineated for perineural invasion. In conclusion, tumor budding is an independent negative prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma associated with lymph node metastasis. The prognostic role of perineural invasion remains uncertain.